Morality must relate, at some level, to the well-being of conscious creatures. If there are more and less effective ways for us to seek happiness and to avoid misery in this world - and there clearly are - then there are right and wrong answers to questions of morality.
Interpretation
Morality is tied to the well-being of conscious beings, suggesting there are correct ways to pursue happiness and avoid suffering.
Sam Harris argues that morality is fundamentally connected to the well-being of conscious creatures. He posits that there are better and worse methods for achieving happiness and avoiding suffering, which implies that moral questions have concrete right and wrong answers based on the outcomes of our actions. This view challenges traditional notions of morality by grounding it in empirical understanding rather than abstract principles.
In practice
In a discussion about ethical living, one might reference this quote to emphasize the importance of actions that promote well-being.
Everything we do is for the purpose of altering consciousness. We form friendships so that we can feel certain emotions, like love, and avoid others, like loneliness. We eat specific foods to enjoy their fleeting presence on our tongues. We read for the pleasure of thinking another person's thoughts.
What I'm asking you to entertain is that there is nothing we need to believe on insufficient evidence in order to have deeply ethical and spiritual lives.
The core of science is not a mathematical modeling--it is intellectual honesty. It is a willingness to have our certainties about the world constrained by good evidence and good argument.
It is time that we admitted that faith is nothing more than the license religious people give one another to keep believing when reasons fail.
It is taboo in our society to criticize a persons religious faith... these taboos are offensive, deeply unreasonable, but worse than that, they are getting people killed. This is really my concern. My concern is that our religions, the diversity of our religious doctrines, is going to get us killed. I'm worried that our religious discourse- our religious beliefs are ultimately incompatible with civilization.
It is time that scientists and other public intellectuals observed that the contest between faith and reason is zero-sum.
People are still asking me if I knew Star Wars was going to be that big of a hit. Yes, we all knew. The only one who didn't know was George.
You can't have something without nothing.
At the time I could no more believe my eyes than now I can trust my memory.
Personally, I'd have welcomed a dementor attack. A deadly struggle for my soul would have broken the monotony nicely.
A rational man acting in the real world may be defined as one who decides where he will strike a balance between what he desires and what can be done.
To protest in the name of morality against 'excesses' or 'abuses' is an error which hints on active complicity. There are no 'abuses' or 'excesses' here, simpily an all-pervasive system.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.