Other intelligent life-forms will differ greatly in appearance - they may resemble the creature in E.T. or startle us with their beauty - but life itself is common, I'm certain.
While NASA talks about 'Are we alone?' as a number one question, they are putting zero money into searching for intelligent life. There's a big disconnect there.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the contradiction between NASA's interest in searching for extraterrestrial intelligence and their lack of financial investment in such efforts.
Frank Drake's quote points out a significant inconsistency in how organizations prioritize their scientific inquiries. While the question of whether intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is deemed critically important, the lack of funding for actual research efforts indicates a gap between rhetoric and action. This disconnect raises questions about how priorities are set in scientific exploration and the importance of backing significant questions with appropriate resources.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about space exploration during a scientific conference.
More from Frank Drake
All quotes βForty years as an astronomer have not quelled my enthusiasm for lying outside after dark, staring up at the stars. It isn't only the beauty of the night sky that thrills me. It's the sense I have that some of those points of light are the home stars of beings not so different from us, daily cares and all, who look across space with wonder, just as we do.
There was a magic about pulsars... no other things in the sky had such labels on them. Each one had its own distinct pulsing frequency, so it could be identified by anybody, including other creatures, after a long period of time and far, far away.
Right now, there could well be messages from the stars flying right through this room. Through you and me. And if we had the right receiver set up properly, we could detect them. I still get chills thinking about it.
We send messages all the time, free of charge. There's a big shell out there now, 80 light-years around us. A civilization only a little more advanced than we are can pick those things up.
Similar quotes
If you go down through the horizon of a black hole, at the center you don't find a tunnel that leads you to some other place in the universe.
I just felt that space was the next thing coming in aviation. It was higher, faster. It had the risk.
Nuclear energy, in terms of an overall safety record, is better than other energy.
It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory-if we look for confirmations. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions... A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or refute it.
The primitive fight-or-flight regions of our mammalian brains react to immediate danger. We instinctively run from an avalanche but the gradual retreat of a glacier, the portent of the far greater danger of rising temperatures and rising oceans, just doesn't get through to us in the same way.
The phenomena of nature, especially those that fall under the inspection of the astronomer, are to be viewed, not only with the usual attention to facts as they occur, but with the eye of reason and experience.