The fact of the matter is that the 'real world' is to a large extent unconsciously built up on the language habits of the group.
National languages are all huge systems of vested interests which sullenly resist critical inquiry.
Interpretation
What this quote means
National languages are influenced by various interests that often resist scrutiny and questioning.
Edward Sapir's quote highlights the complex and often entrenched nature of national languages, suggesting that they are not merely tools for communication but are deeply intertwined with the interests and power structures within society. These vested interests can create a reluctance to critically examine or challenge the norms and values associated with these languages, emphasizing the importance of questioning and understanding the underlying motivations behind language use.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on linguistic anthropology, one might quote Sapir to emphasize the societal implications of language.
More from Edward Sapir
All quotes →In a sense, every form of expression is imposed upon one by social factors, one's own language above all.
No important national language, at least in the Occidental world, has complete regularity of grammatical structure, nor is there a single logical category which is adequately and consistently handled in terms of linguistic symbolism.
No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality.
It would, of course, be hopeless to attempt to crowd into an international language all those local overtones of meaning which are so dear to the heart of the nationalist.
It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection.
Similar quotes
It is cold anarchy to say that all men are to meddle in all men'smarriages. It is cold anarchy to say that any doctor may seize andsegregate anyone he likes. But it is not anarchy to say that a fewgreat hygienists might enclose or limit the life of all citizens,as nurses do with a family of children. It is not anarchy, it istyranny; but tyranny is a workable thing.
If something is right (or wrong) for us, it’s right (or wrong) for others. It follows that if it’s wrong for Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and a long list of others to bomb Washington and New York, then it’s wrong for Rumsfeld to bomb Afghanistan (on much flimsier pretexts), and he should be brought before war crimes trials.
When the female voice is repressed and stifled, the entire community can easily find themselves cut off from the sacred feminine, depriving themselves of the full image of god.
Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can exist without a cause.
Astounded—and indifferent—for he was a man who, in effect, had no ‘day before’.
I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms.