I always do the first line well, but I have trouble doing the others.
Nearly all men die of their medicines, not of their diseases.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the idea that often the treatments we use can be more harmful than the diseases themselves.
Moliere's quote reflects the critical view of medicine and its potential dangers, suggesting that the interventions designed to cure or alleviate ailments can sometimes lead to greater harm than the conditions they aim to treat. This statement serves as a cautionary reminder to consider the effects of medical treatments and to maintain a balance between healing and the potential for harm, prompting deeper reflection on the practices of healthcare and the importance of careful consideration in medical decisions.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a medical ethics discussion, I might use this quote to highlight the risks of over-medication.
More from Moliere
All quotes →Beauty without intelligence is like a hook without bait.
Betrayed and wronged in everything, I’ll flee this bitter world where vice is king, And seek some spot unpeopled and apart Where I’ll be free to have an honest heart. - Molière, The Misanthrope
Long is the road from conception to completion.
Oh, I may be devout, but I am human all the same.
Hypocrisy is a fashionable vice, and all fashionable vices pass for virtue.
Similar quotes
When I write a scientific treatise, I might reach 100 people. When the 'National Geographic' covers a project, it communicates about plants and fish and underwater technology to more than 10 million people.
That the fundamental aspects of heredity should have turned out to be so extraordinarily simple supports us in the hope that nature may, after all, be entirely approachable. Her much-advertised inscrutability has once more been found to be an illusion due to our ignorance. This is encouraging, for, if the world in which we live were as complicated as some of our friends would have us believe we might well despair that biology could ever become an exact science.
We live inside our universe and cannot get a bird's-eye view of it from outside. And we cannot even see all of our universe. Distant parts of it are expanding away from us so fast that they are invisible; they go faster than the speed of light. Having bigger telescopes to see fainter stars will not help us here: invisible is truly invisible.
When I began in 1960, individuality wasn't an accepted thing to look for; it was about species-specific behaviour. But animal behaviour is not hard science. There's room for intuition.
What is the difference between a 2°C world and a 4°C world? Human civilisation!
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.