Nevertheless, the number of farmers, small as well as large, who are adopting the new seeds and new technology is increasing very rapidly, and the increase in numbers during the past three years has been phenomenal.
Interpretation
The adoption of new agricultural technology by farmers is rapidly increasing, leading to significant growth in recent years.
This quote by Norman Borlaug highlights the remarkable shift in farming practices where both small and large-scale farmers are embracing innovative seeds and technologies. It signifies a transformative period in agriculture, indicating that advancements in technology are being recognized and utilized by a growing number of farmers, which can have profound impacts on productivity and food security.
In practice
In a presentation about the future of agriculture, this quote can be used to emphasize the importance of adopting new technologies.
During the past three years spectacular progress has been made in increasing wheat, rice, and maize production in several of the most populous developing countries of southern Asia, where widespread famine appeared inevitable only five years ago
We must recognize the fact that adequate food is only the first requisite for life. For a decent and humane life, we must also provide an opportunity for good education, remunerative employment, comfortable housing, good clothing, and effective and compassionate medical care.
We are 6.6 billion people now. We can only feed 4 billion. I don't see 2 billion volunteers to disappear.
Africa needs roads. Roads bring know-how and fertilizer to farmers and ideas and business for commerce.
This is a basic problem, to feed 6.6 billion people. Without fertilizer, forget it. The game is over.
For, behind the scenes, halfway around the world in Mexico, were two decades of aggressive research on wheat that not only enabled Mexico to become self-sufficient with respect to wheat production but also paved the way to rapid increase in its production in other countries.
The social media platforms have taken over the distribution of news globally. They treat a lie the same way you would treat a fact.
An invention has to make sense in the world it finishes in, not in the world it started.
The fear isn't that big data discriminates. We already know that it does. It's that you don't know if you've been discriminated against.
All of us technology companies need to create some tools that help diminish the volume of fake news. We must try to squeeze this without stepping on freedom of speech and of the press, but we must also help the reader.
If a major source of the nation's news is personalizing user experiences, people with different points of view will end up in echo chambers of their own design. Facebook didn't create that problem, but it shouldn't aggravate it.
Our machines increasingly do our work for us. Why doesn't this make our labor redundant and our skills obsolete? Why are there still so many jobs?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.