We live in the best of all possible worlds
Gottfried LeibnizRead
According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God's making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.
Interpretation
This quote critiques the view that God must intervene in creation to keep it functioning, contrasting it with the idea of a perfect, self-sustaining universe.
Gottfried Leibniz critiques the notion held by Newton and some of his followers that God needs to continually intervene in the mechanics of the universe, akin to a clockmaker winding a watch. He suggests that if God had truly created a perfect universe, such intervention would be unnecessary, implying that a truly divine creation would operate autonomously without frequent repairs or adjustments.
In practice
In a debate about the nature of divine intervention during a philosophy seminar.
We live in the best of all possible worlds
I am so in favor of the actual infinite that instead of admitting that Nature abhors it, as is commonly said, I hold that Nature makes frequent use of it everywhere, in order to show more effectively the perfections of its Author.
It is unworthy of excellent men to lose hours like slaves in the labor of calculation which could be relegated to anyone else if machines were used.
..This is why the ultimate reason of things must lie in a necessary substance, in which the differentiation of the changes only exists eminently as in their source; and this is what we call God.
...a distinction must be made between true and false ideas, and that too much rein must not be given to a man's imagination under pretext of its being a clear and distinct intellection.
These principles have given me a way of explaining naturally the union or rather the mutual agreement [conformité] of the soul and the organic body. The soul follows its own laws, and the body likewise follows its own laws; and they agree with each other in virtue of the pre-established harmony between all substances, since they are all representations of one and the same universe.
I find this in all these places I've been travelling - from India to China, to Japan and Europe and to Brazil - there is a frustration with the terms of public discourse, with a kind of absence of discussion of questions of justice and ethics and of values.
Without restoring an ethos of social responsibility, there can be no meaningful and sustained economic recovery.
We must remember that Islam is not an enemy, and we have no war with Islam.
I don't know what it is about death that makes it so hard. I suppose it's the one-sided communication; the fact that we never get to ask our loved one if she suffered, if she is happy wherever she is now...if she is somewhere. It's the question mark that comes with death that we can't face, not the period.
I went to India and was quite taken with it. There's a feeling there that things are holy first and useful second.
And I suddenly think, as I look across the table at him, that these are the days as they will be. This is the future as we see it. The swerve and the static. The confidence and the doubt.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.