We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet.
Stephen HawkingRead
One can't predict the weather more than a few days in advance.
Interpretation
Weather forecasting has its limits and becomes less accurate over longer time frames.
Stephen Hawking's quote highlights the inherent challenges and uncertainties in predicting weather patterns. It suggests that while short-term forecasts can be reasonably accurate, long-term predictions are fraught with complexities that make them unreliable, reflecting the limitations of our current understanding in meteorology and the chaotic nature of the atmosphere.
In practice
In a conversation about climate change, one might mention, 'As Stephen Hawking said, one can't predict the weather more than a few days in advance.'
We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet.
I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.
It surprises me how disinterested we are today about things like physics, space, the universe and philosophy of our existence, our purpose, our final destination. Its a crazy world out there. Be curious.
I was not a good student. I did not spend much time at college; I was too busy enjoying myself.
The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological-technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.
In my opinion, there is no aspect of reality beyond the reach of the human mind.
Science is a human activity, and the best way to understand it is to understand the individual human beings who practise it. Science is an art form and not a philosophical method. The great advances in science usually result from new tools rather than from new doctrines. ... Every time we introduce a new tool, it always leads to new and unexpected discoveries, because Nature's imagination is richer than ours.
My practise as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume that no god, angel, or devil is going to interfere with its course; and this assumption has been justified by such success as I have achieved in my professional career. I should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world. And I should be a coward if I did not state my theoretical views in public.
There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere.
People make their own fates, and if enough of us make our fate to be space explorers, perhaps we can actually get some space exploration done.
A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.
If you look at all the serious scientists in the world, there is no big disagreement on the basics of this...it would be absolute lunacy to act as if climate change is not occurring.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.