So long as readers keep reading and my publishers keep publishing, I plan to keep on writing. I'd have to be an idiot to be burnt-out in this job.
People, Reacher was certain about. Dogs were different. People had freedom of choice. If a man or a woman ran snarling toward him, they did so because they chose to. They were asking for whatever they got. His response was their problem. But dogs were different. No free will. Easily misled. It raised an ethical problem. Shooting a dog because it had been induced to do something unwise was not the sort of thing Reacher wanted to do.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on the moral implications of choice and responsibility in humans versus the instinct-driven actions of dogs.
In this quote, Lee Child explores the ethical dilemmas faced when considering the actions of humans and dogs. Unlike people, who make conscious choices and bear the consequences of their actions, dogs lack free will and can be easily manipulated, raising questions about moral accountability. Reacher grapples with the idea that while humans must be held responsible for their choices, punishing a dog for behavior controlled by external influences feels unjust.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
Discussing the responsibilities we have towards animals during a speech on animal rights.
More from Lee Child
All quotes →Male authors always take care to make their heroes at least one inch taller than they are, and considerably more muscular. Just as female authors give their heroines better hair and slimmer thighs.
Reacher said, "So here's the thing Brett. Either you take your hand off my chest, or I'll take it off your wrist.
The way to write a thriller is to ask a question at the beginning, and answer it at the end.
It gives me some kind of chance to survive the night." "How are those better odds? If you come back with me, you're guaranteed to survive the night." "No," Reacher said. "If I come back with you, I'm guaranteed to die of shame.
Similar quotes
Evey Hammond: Who are you? V: Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask. Evey Hammond: Well I can see that. V: Of course you can. I'm not questioning your powers of observation I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is
Such is of the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere.
My father, a bookkeeper who never earned more than $11,000 a year in his life, sat there, writing out a $25 check to the NAACP. When I asked him why, he said discrimination against anyone is discrimination against us all. And I never forgot that. Indeed, his philanthropy was a gift, not just to that organization, but to me.
Only ambition is fired by the coincidences of success and easy accomplishment but nothing is quite as splendidly uplifting to the heart as the defeat of a human being who battles against the invincible superiority of fate. This is always the most grandiose of all tragedies, one sometimes created by a dramatist but created thousands of times by life.
We drift down time, clutching at straws. But what good's a brick to a drowning man?
The role of the intellectual cannot be to excuse the violence of one side and condemn that of the other.