Philanthropy can be integrated into business. I believe strongly that companies can be incredible agents of good in the world.
Interpretation
Philanthropy can enhance business practices, making companies influential forces for positive change.
Marc Benioff's quote emphasizes the idea that businesses have the potential to do more than just generate profit; they can act as catalysts for social good. By integrating philanthropy into corporate strategies, companies can create a significant positive impact on society, demonstrating that ethical responsibility and business success can coexist harmoniously.
In practice
In a corporate presentation about corporate social responsibility, this quote can inspire actions towards philanthropy.
Once you know what you want and what is important for you to achieve, also define the values associated with it. What is important? That is something a lot of entrepreneurs pass by too quickly. For us, the things that were important were, No. 1, customer success. Nothing is more important to us than making sure every customer is successful in our service.
I strongly believe the business of a business is to improve the world.
The secret to successful hiring is this: look for the people who want to change the world.
I don't look at business as a zero-sum game. I don't. I've never seen it play out that way in our industry, and I think you innovate and you add value, deliver value back to customers, and you get value back from the world.
Although I loved working on technology - I've always been a computer geek at heart - my professors encouraged me to get a real-world job working with customers.
The only constant in the technology industry is change.
None but a good man is really a living man, and the more good any man does, the more he really lives. All the rest is death, or belongs to it.
Biographies are no longer written to explain or explore the greatness of the great. They redress balances, explore secret weaknesses, demolish legends.
Philosophers are very severe towards other philosophers because they expect too much.
Something which is against natural laws seems to me rather out of the question because it would be a depressive idea about God. It would make God smaller than he must be assumed. When he stated that these laws hold, then they hold, and he wouldn't make exceptions. This is too human an idea. Humans do such things, but not God.
One must confront vague ideas with clear images.
What the government wants is something they never had before. They want total awareness. The question is, is that something we should be allowing?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.