No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the conflict between public opinion favoring embryonic stem cell research and the influence of a vocal religious minority against it.
James D. Watson's quote addresses the disparity between the majority of Americans who support embryonic stem cell research and the politicians who cater to a small but vocal group of religious individuals opposing this scientific advancement. This situation can hinder the progression of potentially groundbreaking medical technologies that could improve lives and drive scientific innovation.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on healthcare policy, this quote can illustrate the tension between scientific progress and political decision-making.
More from James D. Watson
All quotes →I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Take young researchers, put them together in virtual seclusion, give them an unprecedented degree of freedom and turn up the pressure by fostering competitiveness.
Similar quotes
Science is nothing but developed perception, interpreted intent, common sense rounded out and minutely articulated.
The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform... But it is likely to exert an indirect and reciprocal influence on science itself.
To move forward, what's required is a unified space agenda based on exploration, science, development, commerce, and security.
Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck by this simple experiment.
Unfortunately what is little recognized is that the most worthwhile scientific books are those in which the author clearly indicates what he does not know; for an author most hurts his readers by concealing difficulties.
Just by studying mathematics we can hope to make a guess at the kind of mathematics that will come into the physics of the future... If someone can hit on the right lines along which to make this development, it may lead to a future advance in which people will first discover the equations and then, after examining them, gradually learn how to apply them... My own belief is that this is a more likely line of progress than trying to guess at physical pictures.