All the world knows me in my book, and my book in me.
Michel De MontaigneRead
Que sçais-je?" (What do I know?)
Interpretation
This quote expresses skepticism about the completeness of human knowledge.
Michel De Montaigne's question 'Que sçais-je?' challenges individuals to reflect on their own understanding and the limitations of their knowledge. It emphasizes humility in the pursuit of wisdom, suggesting that true insight comes from recognizing what we do not know, encouraging a lifelong journey of learning and exploration beyond certainties.
In practice
In a classroom discussion about the value of questioning what we know.
All the world knows me in my book, and my book in me.
All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.
Pythagoras used to say that life resembles the Olympic Games: a few people strain their muscles to carry off a prize; others bring trinkets to sell to the crowd for gain; and some there are, and not the worst, who seek no other profit than to look at the show and see how and why everything is done; spectators of the life of other people in order to judge and regulate their own.
There is not much less vexation in the government of a private family than in the managing of an entire state.
Those who have compared our life to a dream were right... we were sleeping wake, and waking sleep.
Such as are in immediate fear of a losing their estates, of banishment, or of slavery, live in perpetual anguish, and lose all appetite and repose; whereas such as are actually poor, slaves, or exiles, ofttimes live as merrily as other folk.
All that belongs to human understanding, in this deep ignorance and obscurity, is to be sceptical, or at least cautious, and not to admit of any hypothesis whatever, much less of any which is supported by no appearance of probability.
Poverty is not socialism. To be rich is glorious.
The most thought-provoking thing in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking.
Your strength as a rationalist is your ability to be more confused by fiction than by reality. If you are equally good at explaining any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
The reflection, the verisimilitude, of life that shines in the fleshly cells from the soul source is the only cause of man's attachment to his body; obviously he would not pay solicitous homage to a clod of clay. A human being falsely identifies himself with his physical form because the life currents from the soul are breath-conveyed into the flesh with such intense power that man mistakes the effect for a cause, and idolatrously imagines the body to have life of its own.
If that glad message of your Bible were written in your faces, you would not need to demand belief in the authority of that book in such stiff-necked fashion.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.