The strength of a theory is not what it allows, but what it prohibits; if you can invent an equally persuasive explanation for any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
Eliezer YudkowskyRead
Your strength as a rationalist is your ability to be more confused by fiction than by reality. If you are equally good at explaining any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
Interpretation
Rationalists may find fiction more bewildering than reality, indicating a deep understanding is necessary for insight.
Eliezer Yudkowsky's quote suggests that a true rationalist values clarity and understanding over mere explanation. If one can manipulate any scenario to appear equally valid, it reveals a lack of true comprehension of the underlying principles and truths of reality. The ability to grapple with complex ideas and discern truth from fiction denotes a more sophisticated level of thought.
In practice
During a philosophy lecture, to illustrate the importance of discerning reality from fiction.
The strength of a theory is not what it allows, but what it prohibits; if you can invent an equally persuasive explanation for any outcome, you have zero knowledge.
If our extinction proceeds slowly enough to allow a moment of horrified realization, the doers of the deed will likely be quite taken aback on realizing that they have actually destroyed the world. Therefore I suggest that if the Earth is destroyed, it will probably be by mistake.
In our skulls, we carry around 3 pounds of slimy, wet, greyish tissue, corrugated like crumpled toilet paper. You wouldn't think, to look at the unappetizing lump, that it was some of the most powerful stuff in the known universe.
[...] intelligent people only have a certain amount of time (measured in subjective time spent thinking about religion) to become atheists. After a certain point, if you're smart, have spent time thinking about and defending your religion, and still haven't escaped the grip of Dark Side Epistemology, the inside of your mind ends up as an Escher painting.
The obvious choice isn't always the best choice, but sometimes, by golly, it is. I don't stop looking as soon I find an obvious answer, but if I go on looking, and the obvious-seeming answer still seems obvious, I don't feel guilty about keeping it.
When something is universal enough in our everyday lives, we take it for granted to the point of forgetting it exists.
All I require of a religion is that it be tolerant of those who do not agree with it.
e quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle" ("and thence we came forth to see again the stars")
The idol is the expression of religion.
If the world is to save any part of its resources for the future, it must reduce not only consumption but the number of consumers.
Most of the world's religions serve only to strengthen attachments to false concepts such as self and other, life and death, heaven and earth, and so on. Those who become entangled in these false ideas are prevented from perceiving the Integral Oneness.
On the whole, men are more good than bad; that, however, isn't the real point. But they are more or less ignorant, and it is this that we call vice or virtue; the most incorrigible vice being that of an ignorance that fancies it knows everything and therefore claims for itself the right to kill. The soul of the murderer is blind; and there can be no true goodness nor true love without the utmost clear-sightedness.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.