Writing is a way of talking without being interrupted.
I have no religion,’ says Borneau, ‘but I respect the religion of others. Religion is sacred.’ Why this privilege, this immunity?... A believer creates God in his own image; if he is ugly, his God will be morally ugly. Why should moral ugliness be respectable?
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote reflects on the nature of religious belief and morality, suggesting that people's perceptions of God often mirror their own traits.
Jules Renard's quote explores the relationship between individual morality and the conception of God within various religions. He articulates a critical view, questioning why qualities associated with moral ugliness should be honored if they stem from a flawed understanding of divinity, emphasizing the subjectivity inherent in religious beliefs and highlighting the need for respect towards different faiths while also demanding accountability for perceived moral shortcomings.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a discussion about interfaith dialogue to emphasize the importance of respect for differing beliefs.
More from Jules Renard
All quotes →If one were to build the house of happiness, the largest space would be the waiting room.
When I think of all the books still left for me to read, I am certain of further happiness.
It doesn't pay to say too much when you are mad enough to choke. For the word that stings the deepest is the word that is never spoke, Let the other fellow wrangle till the storm has blown away, then he'll do a heap of thinking about the things you didn't say.
Literature is an occupation in which you have to keep proving your talent to people who have none
If I had my life to live over again, I would ask that not a thing be changed, but that my eyes be opened wider.
Similar quotes
Thus to share in the sufferings of Christ is, at the same time, to suffer for the kingdom of God. In the eyes of the just God, before his judgment. Those who share in the sufferings of Christ become worthy of this kingdom.
People, human beings with all their creative diversity, are the makers of history.
I do not play chess – I fight at chess. Therefore, I willingly combine the tactical with the strategic, the fantastic with the scientific, the combinative with the positional, and I aim to respond to the demands of each given position.
For no man can forbid the spark nor tell whence it may come.
In working with those who are dying, I offer another human being a spacious environment with my mind in which they can die as they need to die. I have no right to define how another person should die. I'm just there to help them transition, however they need to do it.
First... a new theory is attacked as absurd; then it is admitted to be true, but obvious and insignificant; finally it is seen to be so important that its adversaries claim that they themselves discovered it.