Writing is a way of talking without being interrupted.
Literature is an occupation in which you have to keep proving your talent to people who have none
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the challenge writers face in gaining recognition and appreciation from an audience that may not understand their craft.
Jules Renard's quote encapsulates the struggles of literary artists who must continuously validate their skills in front of critics or audiences that may lack the necessary appreciation or talent themselves. It suggests the often unrecognized effort and perseverance required to succeed in the literary world, where the opinions of those who do not create can weigh heavily on the confidence of the creators.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech at a writing conference, one might quote this to inspire fellow authors about the persistence needed in their craft.
More from Jules Renard
All quotes βIf one were to build the house of happiness, the largest space would be the waiting room.
When I think of all the books still left for me to read, I am certain of further happiness.
It doesn't pay to say too much when you are mad enough to choke. For the word that stings the deepest is the word that is never spoke, Let the other fellow wrangle till the storm has blown away, then he'll do a heap of thinking about the things you didn't say.
I have no religion,β says Borneau, βbut I respect the religion of others. Religion is sacred.β Why this privilege, this immunity?... A believer creates God in his own image; if he is ugly, his God will be morally ugly. Why should moral ugliness be respectable?
If I had my life to live over again, I would ask that not a thing be changed, but that my eyes be opened wider.
Similar quotes
You want in all cases for the story to get through the writing.
Most American writers don't get asked their opinion on current affairs, whereas in Europe and England, we still do. There are writers here who are the most sophisticated commentators, but they're not asked. Like Don DeLillo, who sort of forecast most of the modern world before it happened.
Walter Scott has no business to write novels, especially good ones. It is not fair. He has fame and profit enough as a poet, and should not be taking the bread out of the mouths of other people.
A book is sent out into the world, and there is no way of fully anticipating the responses it will elicit. Consider the responses called forth by the Bible, Homer, Shakespeare - let alone contemporary poetry or a modern novel.
One of my biggest peeves is when the writer hasn't given you enough information to figure everything out. You should be able to go back to the beginning of 'Gone Girl,' after you've already read it and you know everything, and say, 'Check - check - yes, she gave us that information.'
Long books, when read, are usually overpraised, because the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time.