I study religion because I find it fascinating and problematic. But I struggle with the idea of what religion is, what being religious means. A lot of people assume that if you write about early Christianity, you must be some kind of Sunday-school teacher.
Interpretation
This quote reflects the complexities of studying religion and challenges the assumptions about what it means to be religious.
Elaine Pagels expresses her intrigue and difficulty in grappling with the essence of religion and the meaning of being religious. She highlights the misconception that those who study religious texts, such as early Christianity, are merely traditional or doctrinal teachers, instead revealing a deeper, more critical engagement with the subject that recognizes both its fascination and its inherent problems.
In practice
In a lecture about the complexities of religious beliefs, this quote can illustrate the nuanced view of faith.
I just have a sense that, you know, I'm curious about what is religion about, you know? Why do some of us still engage it? It's not because it's a set of old beliefs or old ideas. Or even, particularly, the view that this is the only true religion. Many of us no longer accept those views.
There are some kinds of Christianity that insist you have to believe literally in doctrine. The Gnostic gospels open out the complexity and multiplicity of approaches to this. If you think the story of the virgin birth is mistranslated, for instance, it doesn't mean you have to throw out the whole thing.
People who are comfortable with very clear boundaries and group definitions don't like the instability and ambiguity of people who say they are more advanced Christians, or they don't have to do what the bishop says.
Startling as the Gospel of Judas sounds, it amplifies hints we have long read in the Gospels of Mark and John that Jesus knew and even instigated the events of his passion, seeing them as part of a divine plan.
Rediscovering the controversies that occupied early Christianity sharpens our awareness of the major issue in the whole debate, then and now: What is the source of religious authority? For the Christian the question takes more specific form: What is the relation between the authority of ones own experience and that claimed for the scriptures, the ritual and the clergy?
The author of the Gospel of Judas wasn't against martyrdom, and he didn't ever insult the martyrs. He said it's one thing to die for God if you have to do that. But it's another thing to say that's what God wants, that this is a glorification of God.
Perfect wisdom has four parts: Wisdom, the principle of doing things aright. Justice, the principle of doing things equally in public and private. Fortitude, the principle of not fleeing danger, but meeting it. Temperance, the principle of subduing desires and living moderately.
It is myself I have never met whose face is pasted on the underside of my mind
Ridicule is generally made use of to laugh men out of virtue and good sense, by attacking everything praiseworthy in human life.
We often think we express negative emotions, not because we cannot help it, but because we should express them.
All of us, poor & rich alike, have been conditioned by our upbringings. Impoverished men & women may become lulled into a state of "learned helplessness" without hope to change their lives. Likewise, the wealthy can walk in a state of "learned blindness" ignoring the desperation of the local & global poor.
Arguments are extremely vulgar, for everyone in good society holds exactly the same opinion.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.