The idea that political freedom can be preserved in the absence of economic freedom, and vice versa, is an illusion. Political freedom is the corollary of economic freedom.
Ludwig Von MisesRead
As the science of economics...exploded the fallacies of every brand of utopianism, it was outlawed and stigmatized as unscientific.
Interpretation
This quote highlights how economic science challenged idealistic visions by revealing their flaws, yet faced criticism as unscientific.
Ludwig Von Mises emphasizes the tension between economic science and utopian ideals. He suggests that the rigorous analysis provided by economics often illuminates the unrealistic nature of utopias, leading to backlash from proponents of such visions who deem economics to be unscientific. This reflects the struggle between empirical evidence and aspirational thinking in societal discourse.
In practice
In a lecture discussing the pitfalls of utopian societies, this quote can be used to emphasize the importance of economic analysis.
The idea that political freedom can be preserved in the absence of economic freedom, and vice versa, is an illusion. Political freedom is the corollary of economic freedom.
Wars of aggression are popular nowadays with those nations convinced that only victory and conquest could improve their material well-being.
Only stilted pedants can conceive the idea that there are absolute norms to tell what is beautiful and what is not. They try to derive from the works of the past a code of rules with which, as they fancy, the writers and artists of the future should comply. But the genius does not cooperate with the pundit.
The most serious dangers for American freedom and the American way of life do not come from without.
The public firm can nowhere maintain itself in free competition with the private firm; it is possible today only where it has a monopoly that excludes competition. Even that alone is evidence of its lesser economic productivity.
Each epoch has found in the Gospels what it sought to find there, and has overlooked what it wished to overlook.
Money never seems to be interested in strengthening regulatory agencies, for example, but always in subverting them, in making them miss the danger signs in coal mines and in derivatives trading and in deep-sea oil wells.
In America, people with lots of money can easily avoid the consequences of bad bets and big losses by cashing out at the first sign of trouble.
Many markets work best with little or no outside interference. But others - especially those subject to big 'externalities' - need a helping hand.
If we wait until income inequality is much more severe, we will have a whole class of new superrich who will probably feel entitled to their wealth and will have the means to defend their interest. That's already gone far enough. We shouldn't let it become more extreme.
The reason we should do a carbon tax is because it's the right thing to do. It's economics 101, elementary stuff.
For most Americans, economic growth is a spectator sport.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.