I think of myself as a theater animal instead of an intellectual animal.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes valuing creative expression and performance over purely intellectual pursuits.
Tom Stoppard's quote suggests that he identifies more with the emotional and dynamic aspects of theater than with the analytical and cognitive aspects associated with intellectualism. It highlights the importance of creativity, passion, and the human experience in the field of theater, affirming that art can evoke feelings and connections that transcend mere intellectual thought.
In practice
During a film festival, this quote could be used to introduce a discussion about the role of creativity in cinema.
Love is - OK, it's 20 things, but it isn't 19. And I think that love reaches for something which is very, very deep in us and is very easily obscured, and is also very easily denied, which is the instinct towards the other person, other than toward the self.
A movie camera is like having someone you have a crush on watching you from afar - you pretend it's not there.
I once did a radio program with a famous materialist, that is to say a scientist who believed that absolutely everything was physical and that all emotions were reductive to little electrical impulses in your neurons. And I found that I didn't believe that. But what the emotions really are, I don't have an alternative theory.
One of the reasons why there are so many versions of Chekhov is that translations date in a way that the original doesn't; translations seem to be of their time.
A Chinaman of the T'ang Dynasty—and, by which definition, a philosopher—dreamed he was a butterfly, and from that moment he was never quite sure that he was not a butterfly dreaming it was a Chinese philosopher. Envy him; in his two-fold security.
Chekhov directors and Chekhov actors love working on his plays because there seems to be no end to what you can find out about the micro-narrative when you're investigating a text.
Writing is a consequence of having been 'haunted' by material. Why this is, no one knows.
Writers remember everything...especially the hurts. Strip a writer to the buff, point to the scars, and he'll tell you the story of each small one. From the big ones you get novels. A little talent is a nice thing to have if you want to be a writer, but the only real requirement is the ability to remember the story of every scar. Art consists of the persistence of memory.
It's so easy to call something a Jewish story or a gay story or a woman's story. Aesthetically, if a story is not universal, it has failed. Your obligation is to the story. One rule creatively, and emotionally, is its universality.
Like dancers with choreography or actors with scripts, jazz singers could take material that was known, even loved, then risk interpreting and revising it. They could conceal even as they revealed themselves. Inflection, timing and tonality were their language, at least as much as words.
Being an artist is this kind of occupation in which you have to make people care about your obsession.
I have often seen an actor laugh off the stage, but I don't remember ever having seen one weep.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.