The scientists who attack mainstream religion, rather than striving for peaceful coexistence with it, damage science, and also weaken the fight against fundamentalism.
Martin ReesRead
We can trace things back to the earlier stages of the Big Bang, but we still don't know what banged and why it banged. That's a challenge for 21st-century science.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the limitations of current scientific understanding regarding the origins of the universe.
Martin Rees points out that while modern science has made significant progress in tracing the origins of the universe back to the Big Bang, fundamental questions about the cause and nature of the Big Bang itself remain unanswered. This reflects the ongoing challenges and mysteries that science faces in its quest to understand the universe.
In practice
In a lecture on cosmology, you might say, 'As Martin Rees pointed out, we can trace the Big Bang, yet the ultimate questions remain unanswered.'
The scientists who attack mainstream religion, rather than striving for peaceful coexistence with it, damage science, and also weaken the fight against fundamentalism.
Let me say that I don't see any conflict between science and religion. I go to church as many other scientists do. I share with most religious people a sense of mystery and wonder at the universe and I want to participate in religious ritual and practices because they're something that all humans can share.
It's becoming clear that in a sense the cosmos provides the only laboratory where sufficiently extreme conditions are ever achieved to test new ideas on particle physics. The energies in the Big Bang were far higher than we can ever achieve on Earth. So by looking at evidence for the Big Bang, and by studying things like neutron stars, we are in effect learning something about fundamental physics.
In the beginning there were only probabilities. The universe could only come into existence if someone observed it. It does not matter that the observers turned up several billion years later. The universe exists because we are aware of it.
Collective human actions are transforming, even ravaging, the biosphere - perhaps irreversibly - through global warming and loss of biodiversity.
It is astonishing that human brains, which evolved to cope with the everyday world, have been able to grasp the counterintuitive mysteries of the cosmos and the quantum.
Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves.
It is certain that there may be extraordinary mental activity with an extremely small absolute mass of nervous matter: thus the wonderfully diversified instincts, mental powers, and affections of ants are notorious, yet their cerebral ganglia are not so large as the quarter of a small pin's head. Under this point of view, the brain of an ant is one of the most marvelous atoms of matter in the world, perhaps more so than the brain of a man.
On seeing the marsupials in Australia for the first time and comparing them to placental mammals: βAn unbeliever . . . might exclaim 'Surely two distinct Creators must have been at work'β
In fourth grade, I was interested in all areas of science. I particularly loved learning about how the earth was created.
There are many who would much prefer that the word 'climate' never be mentioned and that the issue be eliminated from our national conversation.
At its heart, engineering is about using science to find creative, practical solutions. It is a noble profession.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.