People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
Ha-Joon ChangRead
Once you realize that trickle-down economics does not work, you will see the excessive tax cuts for the rick as what they are -- a simple upward redistribution of income, rather than a way to make all of us richer, as we were told.
Interpretation
This quote critiques trickle-down economics, arguing that it leads to wealth accumulation for the rich rather than benefitting everyone.
Ha-Joon Chang's quote emphasizes the flaws in trickle-down economics, which claims that benefits provided to the wealthy will ultimately trickle down to the rest of society. He argues that instead of creating a more equitable wealth distribution, these tax cuts primarily serve to exacerbate income inequality, effectively redistributing wealth upwards rather than enriching the population at large.
In practice
In a discussion on economic policies, one might use this quote to highlight the inefficacy of tax cuts for the wealthy.
People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
Equality of opportunity is meaningless for those who do not have the capabilities to take advantage of it.
The higher education system in these countries (US, Korea etc) has become like a theatre in which some people decided to stand to get a better view, promoting the others behind them to stand. Once enough people stand, everyone has to stand, which means no one is getting a better view, while everyone has become more uncomfortable.
There is no such thing as a free market.
[Good managers] know that people have 'good' sides and 'bad' sides and that the secret of good management is in magnifying the former and toning down the latter.
Tax laws favor capital over labor, giving capital gains a lower rate than ordinary income. The rich get humongous mortgage interest deductions while renters get no deduction at all.
The basis on which good repute in any highly organized industrial community ultimately rests is pecuniary strength; and the means of showing pecuniary strength, and so of gaining or retaining a good name, are leisure and a conspicuous consumption of goods.
I'm just saying that if you understand how the economic machine works, it just works like a machine. There are cause-effect relationships.
Economic medicine that was previously meted out by the cupful has recently been dispensed by the barrel. These once unthinkable dosages will almost certainly bring on unwelcome after-effects. Their precise nature is anyone's guess, though one likely consequence is an onslaught of inflation.
Unless you reduce the long-term spending burden, you cannot cut taxes in any lasting way, but can only shift the burden of taxes from the present to the future.
There should be no unemployment. There is large percentage of labor now which cannot make a living because wages are not high enough. That is industry's 2nd job. 1st job is to make good product. 2nd pay a good wage.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.