People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
Ha-Joon ChangRead
Once you realize that trickle-down economics does not work, you will see the excessive tax cuts for the rick as what they are -- a simple upward redistribution of income, rather than a way to make all of us richer, as we were told.
Interpretation
This quote critiques trickle-down economics, arguing that it leads to wealth accumulation for the rich rather than benefitting everyone.
Ha-Joon Chang's quote emphasizes the flaws in trickle-down economics, which claims that benefits provided to the wealthy will ultimately trickle down to the rest of society. He argues that instead of creating a more equitable wealth distribution, these tax cuts primarily serve to exacerbate income inequality, effectively redistributing wealth upwards rather than enriching the population at large.
In practice
In a discussion on economic policies, one might use this quote to highlight the inefficacy of tax cuts for the wealthy.
People who live in poor countries have to be entrepreneurial even just to survive.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
Equality of opportunity is meaningless for those who do not have the capabilities to take advantage of it.
The higher education system in these countries (US, Korea etc) has become like a theatre in which some people decided to stand to get a better view, promoting the others behind them to stand. Once enough people stand, everyone has to stand, which means no one is getting a better view, while everyone has become more uncomfortable.
There is no such thing as a free market.
[Good managers] know that people have 'good' sides and 'bad' sides and that the secret of good management is in magnifying the former and toning down the latter.
The more the division of labor and the application of machinery extend, the more does competition extend among the workers, the more do their wages shrink together.
True, governments can reduce the rate of interest in the short run. They can issue additional paper money. They can open the way to credit expansion by the banks. They can thus create an artificial boom and the appearance of prosperity. But such a boom is bound to collapse soon or late and to bring about a depression.
The last thing you want to do is raise taxes in the middle of the recession because that would just suck up and take more demand out of the economy and put businesses in a further hole.
The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.
This is the paradox of thrift: belt-tightening causes people to lose their jobs, because other people are not buying what they produce, so their debt burden rises rather than falls.
We will not have any more crashes in our time.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.