Public discourse has been polluted now for decades by corporate-funded disinformation - not just with climate change but with a host of health, environmental and societal threats. The implications for the planet are grim.
Michael E. MannRead
The trouble is that the hockey stick graph become an icon and deniers reckoned if they could smash the icon, the whole concept of global warming would be destroyed with it.
Interpretation
The hockey stick graph symbolizes the reality of global warming, and detractors aim to discredit it to undermine climate change evidence.
Michael E. Mann's quote highlights the significance of the hockey stick graph in representing the rise in global temperatures over time. As an iconic illustration of climate change, skeptics and deniers have targeted this graph in an attempt to delegitimize the broader understanding of human-driven climate change, asserting that if they can disprove this specific reference, they may dispel the entire concept of global warming and its implications for the planet.
In practice
During a climate change discussion panel.
Public discourse has been polluted now for decades by corporate-funded disinformation - not just with climate change but with a host of health, environmental and societal threats. The implications for the planet are grim.
Imagine we could accelerate continuously at 1 g-what we're comfortable with on good old terra firma-to the midpoint of our voyage, and decelerate continuously at 1 g until we arrive at our destination. It would take a day to get to Mars, a week and a half to Pluto, a year to the Oort Cloud, and a few years to the nearest stars.
There are no miracles in agricultural production.
To invoke the origin of the DNA/protein machine by invoking a supernatural Designer is to explain precisely nothing - for it leaves unexplained the origin of the Designer.
We know more about the movement of celestial bodies than about the soil underfoot.
The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response.
I sometimes try to imagine what would have happened if we’d known the bonobo first and the chimpanzee only later—or not at all. The discussion about human evolution might not revolve as much around violence, warfare and male dominance, but rather around sexuality, empathy, caring and cooperation. What a different intellectual landscape we would occupy!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.