No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
I would only once have the opportunity to let my scientific career encompass a path from the double helix to the three billion steps of the human genome.
Interpretation
What this quote means
James D. Watson reflects on his unique journey in genetics from the discovery of DNA's structure to mapping the human genome.
In this quote, James D. Watson expresses the importance and uniqueness of his scientific career, where he made significant contributions to genetics, specifically from his pivotal role in discovering the double helix structure of DNA to participating in the monumental Human Genome Project, which mapped the entire human genome. This journey highlights the interconnectedness of fundamental scientific discoveries and their implications for understanding human biology and disease.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture about genetics, one could use this quote to emphasize the importance of scientific innovation.
More from James D. Watson
All quotes βI think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favour research using embryonic stem cells and yet politicians continue to pander to the outspoken religious minority that is hampering efforts to develop this potentially valuable technology.
DNA was my only gold rush. I regarded DNA as worth a gold rush.
Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible, it is terribly exciting.
If you go into science, I think you better go in with a dream that maybe you, too, will get a Nobel Prize. It's not that I went in and I thought I was very bright and I was going to get one, but I'll confess, you know, I knew what it was.
Similar quotes
I am not deeply involved in Australian politics but I know there are prime ministers, governments around the world who are not acting responsibly in relation to climate change.
People credit me for making the universe interesting when in fact the universe is inherently interesting, and I'm merely revealing that fact. I don't think I'm anything special for this to happen.
Man is slightly nearer to the atom than to the star. ... From his central position man can survey the grandest works of Nature with the astronomer, or the minutest works with the physicist. ... [K]nowledge of the stars leads through the atom; and important knowledge of the atom has been reached through the stars.
The work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
More than any other product of human scientific culture scientific knowledge is the collective property of all mankind.
As a scientist, I want to go to Mars and back to asteroids and the Moon because I'm a scientist. But I can tell you, I'm not so naive a scientist to think that the nation might not have geopolitical reasons for going into space.