Great leaders understand that historical success tends to produce stable and inwardly focused organizations, and these outfits, in turn, reinforce a feeling of contentment with the status quo.
We are always creating new tools and techniques to help people, but the fundamental framework is remarkably resilient, which means it must have something to do with the nature of organizations or human nature.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The essence of organizations remains stable even as we develop new methods to assist people.
In this quote, John P. Kotter emphasizes that while innovation in tools and techniques is crucial for aiding individuals, the underlying principles governing organizations and human nature exhibit a surprising consistency. This resilience suggests that effective structures within organizations are deeply rooted in the fundamental aspects of human interaction and behavior, which do not change as rapidly as the technologies we develop.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a business presentation discussing future strategies, this quote can be used to illustrate the balance between innovation and organizational stability.
More from John P. Kotter
All quotes →Managers are trained to make incremental, programmatic improvements. They aren't trained to lead large-scale change.
Because management deals mostly with the status quo and leadership deals mostly with change, in the next century we are going to have to try to become much more skilled at creating leaders.
Outsiders have the intuitive ability to continually view problems in fresh ways and to identify ineffective practices and traditions.
Those in leadership positions who fail to grasp or use the power of stories risk failure for their companies and for themselves.
Many years ago, I think I got my first insight on how an incredibly diverse team can work together and do astonishing things, and not just misunderstand each other and fight.
Similar quotes
A product needs to be sufficiently innovative to distinguish itself from the pack, but not so forward thinking as to alienate the user.
Smart infrastructure can provide cost-saving ways for municipalities to handle both infrastructure and social needs. And we want to shift the systems that open the doors for people who were formerly tax burdens to become part of the tax base.
It is dangerously destabilizing to have half the world on the cutting edge of technology while the other half struggles on the bare edge of survival.
There's only one trick in software, and that is using a piece of software that's already been written.
You don't get to cut that chain of evidence and start over. You're always going to be pursued by your data shadow, which is forming from thousands and thousands of little leaks and tributaries of information.
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?