That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
Ernest RutherfordRead
I have to keep going, as there are always people on my track. I have to publish my present work as rapidly as possible in order to keep in the race. The best sprinters in this road of investigation are Becquerel and the Curies.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the urgency of progress in scientific research amidst competition.
Ernest Rutherford underscores the relentless nature of scientific advancement where researchers must continually publish their findings to stay relevant and in competition with others like Becquerel and the Curies. This reflects both the pressure to contribute to the field and the importance of rapid dissemination of knowledge in scientific communities.
In practice
In a scientific conference to motivate peers to share their research promptly.
That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.
I am a great believer in the simplicity of things and as you probably know I am inclined to hang on to broad & simple ideas like grim death until evidence is too strong for my tenacity.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Now I know what the atom looks like.
If your result needs a statistician then you should design a better experiment.
Math is the language of the universe. So the more equations you know, the more you can converse with the cosmos.
Science should be the most fun job on the planet. You get to ask questions about the world around you and go out and seek the answers. Not to have fun doing that is crazy.
Clearly, we are a species that is well connected to other species. Whether or not we evolve from them, we are certainly very closely related to them. A series of mutations could change us into all kinds of intermediate species. Whether or not those intermediate species are provably in the past, they could easily be in our future.
Scientists never stop asking. They're little kids who never grew up.
It may be said "In research, if you know what you are doing, then you shouldn't be doing it." In a sense, if the answer turns out to be exactly what you expected, then you have learned nothing new, although you may have had your confidence increased somewhat.
My whole interest is, how do you use evolution as an innovation engine? How does evolution solve new problems that life faces? And to have a system that can create a whole new chemical bond that biology hasn't done before, to me, demonstrates the power of nature to innovate.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.