To say 'I love you' one must first be able to say the 'I.'
There can be no compromise between freedom and government controls; to accept 'just a few controls' is to surrender the principle of inalienable individual rights and to substitute for it the principle of the government’s unlimited, arbitrary power, thus delivering oneself into gradual enslavement. As an example of this process, observe the present domestic policy of the United States.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote stresses the importance of individual freedom and warns against accepting government controls, which can lead to the erosion of personal rights.
Ayn Rand's quote highlights the inherent conflict between individual freedom and government control. She argues that even minor compromises on freedom for the sake of government regulation can lead to a slippery slope towards loss of individual rights, eventually resulting in a state of enslavement. Rand uses the current domestic policies of the United States as a cautionary example of how citizens may unknowingly surrender their freedoms.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a speech about civil liberties, quoting Rand could emphasize the dangers of overreach in government policies.
More from Ayn Rand
All quotes →The difference between animals and humans is that animals change themselves for the environment, but humans change the environment for themselves.
It is my eyes which see, and the sight of my eyes grants beauty to the earth. It is my ears which hear, and the hearing of my ears gives its song to the world. It is my mind which thinks, and the judgement of my mind is the only searchlight that can find the truth. It is my will which chooses, and the choice of my will is the only edict I must respect.
What is the basic, the essential, the crucial principle that differentiates freedom from slavery? It is the principle of voluntary action versus physical coercion or compulsion.
One method of destroying a concept is by diluting its meaning. Observe that by ascribing rights to the unborn, i.e., the nonliving, the anti-abortionists obliterate the rights of the living.
I think that when in doubt about the truth of an issue, it's safer and in better taste to select the least numerous of the adversaries.
Similar quotes
And when that crop grew, and was harvested, no man had crumbled a hot clod in his fingers and let the earth sift past his fingertips. No man had touched the seed, or lusted for the growth. Men ate what they had not raised, had no connection with the bread. The land bore under iron, and under iron gradually died; for it was not loved or hated, it had no prayers or curses.
Guilt, regret, resentment, sadness & all forms of nonforgiveness are caused by too much past & not enough presence.
One can say of language that it is potentially the only human home, the only dwelling place that cannot be hostile to man.
There are some who, for varying reasons, would appease Red China. They are blind to history's clear lesson, for history teaches with unmistakable emphasis that appeasement but begets new and bloodier war. It points to no single instance where this end has justified that means, where appeasement has led to more than a sham peace. Like blackmail, it lays the basis for new and successively greater demands until, as in blackmail, violence becomes the only other alternative.
Apathy is a rational reaction to a system that no longer represents, hears or addresses the vast majority of people.
A wide and vague impression exists that so-called Eastern religion is more contemplative, innocuous, and humane than the proselytizing monotheisms of the West. Don't believe a word of this: try asking the children of Indochina who were dumped by their parents for inherited deformities that were attributed to sins in a previous 'life.