What is the evolutionary value of blushing? It seems not to be to our advantage to do it, to involuntarily reveal our inner emotions. If we're trying to manipulate or lie, actions in furtherance of individual goals as opposed to the goals of others, blushing would not seem to be helpful. And yet everyone blushes, except the psychopath.
Interpretation
Blushing reveals our true emotions, highlighting a conflict between honesty and manipulation.
Frans De Waalβs quote examines the seemingly paradoxical nature of blushing as an involuntary emotional response that reveals our true feelings, which can be seen as a disadvantage when one is attempting to deceive or manipulate others. Despite its lack of apparent evolutionary advantage, the fact that all humans blush, save for psychopaths, suggests that it plays a significant role in our social interactions and may reflect empathy and honesty, key components of forming trust and connections within a community.
In practice
During a psychology class discussion on emotional expressions and their social implications.
As in a Russian doll, however, the outer layers always contain an inner core. Instead of evolution having replaced simpler forms of empathy with more advanced ones, the latter are merely elaborations on the former and remain dependent on them. This also means that empathy comes naturally to us. It is not something we only learn later in life, or that is culturally constructed.
Sometimes I read about someone saying with great authority that animals have no intentions and no feelings, and I wonder, 'Doesn't this guy have a dog?'
Experiments with animals have long been handicapped by our anthropocentric attitude: We often test them in ways that work fine with humans but not so well with other species.
Being both more systematically brutal than chimps and more empathetic than _x000D_ bonobos, we are by far the most bipolar ape. Our societies are never completely peaceful, never completely competitive, never ruled by sheer selfishness, and never perfectly moral.
If you look at human society, it is very easy, of course, to compare our warfare and territoriality with the chimpanzee. But that's only one side of what we do. We also trade, we intermarry, we allow each other to travel through our territory. There's an enormous amount of cooperation.
Human morality is unthinkable without empathy.
Anything that can be done to a rat can be done to a human being. And we can do most anything to rats. This is a hard thing to think about, but it's the truth. It won't go away because we cover our eyes. THAT is cyberpunk.
I felt that chess... is a science in the form of a game... I consider myself a scientist. I wanted to be treated like a scientist.
In this very real world, good doesn't drive out evil. Evil doesn't drive out good. But the energetic displaces the passive.
You're fighting a losing battle if you expect the people who own the studios to make moral choices.
One day some as yet unborn scholar will recognize in the clock the machine that has tamed the wilds.
Again, a law may be both constitutional and expedient, and yet may be administered in an unjust and unfair way.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.