When I learnt to write I became my own master, I became very strong, and that strength is with me to this very day.
V. S. NaipaulRead
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully.
Interpretation
Writing fiction can distort reality, while nonfiction allows for genuine exploration of the world.
V. S. Naipaul suggests that writing exclusively fiction can lead to a distortion of truth, as the need to dramatize and shape narratives might overshadow authentic experiences. In contrast, he advocates for nonfiction as a medium that encourages a deeper understanding and exploration of the world, allowing writers to engage with reality and its complexities in a more truthful manner.
In practice
In a speech about the importance of truthful storytelling, this quote could serve as a reminder for writers to seek authenticity.
When I learnt to write I became my own master, I became very strong, and that strength is with me to this very day.
It is wrong to have an ideal view of the world. That's where the mischief starts. That's where everything starts unravelling.
If you decide to move to another country and to live within its laws you don't express your disregard for the essence of the culture. It's a form of aggression.
One must always try to see the truth of a situation - it makes things universal.
His ignorance seemed to widen with everything he read.
I think when you see so many Hindu temples of the 10th century or earlier disfigured, defaced, you realise that something terrible happened. I feel the civilisation of that closed world was mortally wounded by those invasions the old world is destroyed. That has to be understood. Ancient Hindu India was destroyed.
I don't believe chance can play a role in my literature.
Long books, when read, are usually overpraised, because the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time.
I still believe nonfiction is the most important literature to come out of the second half of the 20th century.
For a lot of readers these days, a book is something you have to agree or disagree with. But you can't agree with a novel. For my generation, it was assumed that a book is a dramatic thing, that the eye of the book is not telling you what to think.
I suppose books mean more than people to me anyway
If the worst comes true, and the paper book joins the papyrus scroll and parchment codex in extinction, we will miss, I predict, a number of things about it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.