The novels that attract me most are those that create an illusion of transparency around a knot of human relationships as obscure, cruel, and perverse as possible.
Italo CalvinoRead
I don't believe chance can play a role in my literature.
Interpretation
It implies that the author believes in deliberate creation over randomness in writing.
Italo Calvino suggests that the process of writing literature is governed by intent and skill rather than sheer luck or coincidence. The statement emphasizes the importance of conscious choices made by the author in crafting stories, indicating that literature is a crafted art form requiring thoughtful engagement rather than relying on the whims of chance.
In practice
During a writing workshop, I shared Calvino's quote to emphasize the importance of deliberate storytelling.
The novels that attract me most are those that create an illusion of transparency around a knot of human relationships as obscure, cruel, and perverse as possible.
Your first book is the only one that matters. Perhaps a writer should write only that one. That is the one moment when you make the big leap; the opportunity to express yourself is offered that once, and you untie the knot within you then or never again.
...and every Wednesday the perfumed young lady slips me a hundred-crown note to leave her alone with the convict. And by Thursday the hundred crowns are already gone in so much beer. And when the visiting hour is over, the young lady comes out with the stink of jail in her elegant clothes; and the prisoner goes back to his cell with the lady's perfume in his jailbird's suit. And I'm left with the smell of beer. Life is nothing but trading smells.
Nobody these days holds the written word in such high esteem as police states do.
The struggle of literature is in fact a struggle to escape from the confines of language; it stretches out from the utmost limits of what can be said; what stirs literature is the call and attraction of what is not in the dictionary.
Fantasy is like jam. . . . You have to spread it on a solid piece of bread. If not, it remains a shapeless thing . . . out of which you canβt make anything.
You hear all this whining going on, "Where are our great writers?" The thing I might feel doleful about is: Where are the readers?
His books were the closest thing he had to furniture and he lived in them the way other men live in easy chairs.
I have said that each aspect of the novel demands a different quality of the reader. Well, the prophetic aspect demands two qualities: humility and the suspension of the sense of humour.
If I pick up a book with spaceships on the cover, I want spaceships. If I see one with dragons, I want there to be dragons inside the book. Proper labeling. Ethical labeling. I don't want to open up my cornflakes and find that they're full of pebbles... You need to respect the reader enough not to call it something it isn't.
Literature sucks you into another psyche. So the creation of empathy necessarily influences how you'll behave to other people.
In relation to a writer, most readers believe in the Double Standard: they may be unfaithful to him as often as they like, but he must never, never be unfaithful to them.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.