The essence of mathematics lies precisely in its freedom.
Georg CantorRead
Mathematics, in the development of its ideas, has only to take account of the immanent reality of its concepts and has absolutely no obligation to examine their transient reality.
Interpretation
Mathematics focuses on abstract concepts rather than their practical application in the real world.
Georg Cantor emphasizes that the essence of mathematics lies in its internal logic and structure, which does not necessitate validation against real-world scenarios. This indicates that mathematical truths are based on inherent properties of the concepts, independent of their tangible manifestations, allowing mathematics to explore realms of thought free from empirical constraints.
In practice
In a mathematics lecture discussing the importance of theoretical frameworks.
The essence of mathematics lies precisely in its freedom.
I realize that in this undertaking I place myself in a certain opposition to views widely held concerning the mathematical infinite and to opinions frequently defended on the nature of numbers.
A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One.
The transfinite numbers are in a sense the new irrationalities [ ... they] stand or fall with the finite irrational numbers.
There is no doubt that we cannot do without variable quantities in the sense of the potential infinite. But from this very fact the necessity of the actual infinite can be demonstrated.
The essence of mathematics lies in its freedom.
We're going to find Marses and maybe Earths out in the solar system's attic of the Oort Cloud and the Kuiper Belt.
It is impossible to devise an experiment without a preconceived idea; devising an experiment, we said, is putting a question; we never conceive a question without an idea which invites an answer. I consider it, therefore, an absolute principle that experiments must always be devised in view of a preconceived idea, no matter if the idea be not very clear nor very well defined.
The trouble is that the hockey stick graph become an icon and deniers reckoned if they could smash the icon, the whole concept of global warming would be destroyed with it.
If I have put the case of science at all correctly, the reader will have recognised that modern science does much more than demand that it shall be left in undisturbed possession of what the theologian and metaphysician please to term its 'legitimate field'. It claims that the whole range of phenomena, mental as well as physical-the entire universe-is its field. It asserts that the scientific method is the sole gateway to the whole region of knowledge.
We know very little about the universe. I personally don't believe it's uniform and the same everywhere. That's like saying the earth is flat.
We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.