The historical profession is nowhere famous for its tolerance, but there are not many countries where historians can expect to pay for their opinions with penal servitude or the firing squad.
Our mental maps are distorted by who are the 'winners' of history and who are the powers of today.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Our perception of history is influenced by those who have succeeded and hold power today.
Norman Davies highlights the idea that our understanding of history is shaped by the narratives of those deemed 'winners.' This suggests that power dynamics influence which stories are told and remembered, leading to potential distortions in how we perceive past events and their significance in shaping the present. It encourages us to question the dominant narratives and to recognize the voices and perspectives that may be overlooked or suppressed.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about social justice, this quote can remind participants to consider whose stories are told and whose are marginalized.
More from Norman Davies
All quotes βTransience is one of the fundamental characteristics both of the human condition and of the political order.
Nowadays, it is no longer possible to maintain that the Nazi-Soviet pact of 23 August 1939 was a fiction invented by bourgeois-imperialist enemies. Everyone has seen the film clips of Herr Ribbentrop landing in Moscow, and of Stalin smiling broadly as Ribbentrop and Molotov signed up side by side.
Why are some things remembered and others forgotten? That is the theme I want to pursue about the Second World War.
One might have thought that 70 years was time enough to work out what really happened in 1939. It isn't the case. Misunderstandings and misinformation abound.
I wanted to produce a book that would demonstrate not only the rich diversity of people who answered to Anders's command but also the extraordinary variety of their experiences and emotions: from death to despair, fear and longings and eventually to hope.
Similar quotes
There is no avoiding the fact that we live at the mercy of our ideas This is never more true than with our ideas about God.
If one yearns to see the face of the Divine, one must break out of the aquarium, escape the fish farm, to go swim up wild cataracts, dive in deep fjords. One must explore the labyrinth of the reef, the shadows of the lily pads. How limiting, how insulting to think of God as a benevolent warden, an absentee hatchery manager who imprisons us in the 'comfort' of artificial pools, where intermediaries sprinkle our restrictive waters with sanitized flakes of processed nutriment.
A superior man in dealing with the world is not for anything or against anything. He follows righteousness as the standard.
Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government.
From 1970 onwards, our culture told both sexes that individual expression was paramount. And for women, that was defined as the right to choose an interesting a career, a high-status mate, the desirable handbag or vacation, the perfect family size, and a definitionally fruitless quest for 'perfection.'
Self-love, my liege, is not so vile a sin, as self-neglecting.