Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.
J. Robert OppenheimerRead
There must be no barriers for freedom of inquiry... There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the importance of freedom in scientific inquiry and the necessity for questioning established beliefs.
J. Robert Oppenheimer's quote highlights the fundamental role of freedom in science, advocating that scientists should not face restrictions or dogmas that impede their quest for knowledge. It suggests that the essence of scientific advancement lies in the ability to pose questions freely, express doubts, and correct misconceptions, which are integral to the pursuit of truth and understanding in the scientific realm.
In practice
This quote can be utilized during a science seminar to encourage open discussions.
Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.
Bertrand Russell had given a talk on the then new quantum mechanics, of whose wonders he was most appreciative. He spoke hard and earnestly in the New Lecture Hall. And when he was done, Professor Whitehead, who presided, thanked him for his efforts, and not least for 'leaving the vast darkness of the subject unobscured'.
There are children playing in the streets who could solve some of my top problems in physics, because they have modes of sensory perception that I lost long ago.
It is perfectly obvious that the whole world is going to hell. The only possible chance that it might not is that we do not attempt to prevent it from doing so.
Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. (quoting the Bhagavad-Gita after witnessing the first Nuclear explosion.)
[About the great synthesis of atomic physics in the 1920s:] It was a heroic time. It was not the doing of any one man; it involved the collaboration of scores of scientists from many different lands. But from the first to last the deeply creative, subtle and critical spirit of Niels Bohr guided, restrained, deepened and finally transmuted the enterprise.
You can't turn on your television without seeing these advertisements about clean coal, clean tar sands and the claim that there's more jobs associated with fossil fuels than other industries. That's of course not true. But they're hammering that into the voters' heads.
What are the chances that we will one day discover that DNA has absolutely nothing to do with inheritance? They are effectively zero.
I protest against the use of infinite magnitude ..., which is never permissible in mathematics.
Researchers keep identifying new species, but they have no idea about the life cycle of a given species or its other hosts. They cut open an animal and find a new species. Where did it come from? What effect does it have on its host? What is its next host? They don't know and they don't have time to find out, because there are too many other species waiting to be discovered and described.
Now it is quite clear to me that there are no solid spheres in the heavens, and those that have been devised by the authors to save the appearances, exist only in the imagination.
[Decoding the human genome sequence] is the most significant undertaking that we have mounted so far in an organized way in all of science. I believe that reading our blueprints, cataloguing our own instruction book, will be judged by history as more significant than even splitting the atom or going to the moon.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.