Sustainability can't be like some sort of a moral sacrifice or political dilemma or a philanthropical cause. It has to be a design challenge.
Bjarke IngelsRead
One of the dilemmas of architecture in general is that there is a Catch-22 - you can't actually get to be commissioned to do certain types of building until you've already built that type of building. So it seems to be incredibly hard to get going.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the paradox in architecture where one needs experience to gain commissions yet cannot gain experience without initial projects.
Bjarke Ingels discusses a common paradox in the field of architecture, known as a Catch-22, where aspiring architects face the challenge of needing prior experience to secure commissions for certain building types. This creates a barrier that discourages entry into the field, as many struggle to find opportunities to demonstrate their capability without having first completed similar projects.
In practice
This quote can be used in a lecture discussing the challenges faced by architecture students.
Sustainability can't be like some sort of a moral sacrifice or political dilemma or a philanthropical cause. It has to be a design challenge.
For me, architecture is the means, not the end. It's a means of making different life forms possible.
Design our world so that we have positive social and environmental side effects.
In the big picture, architecture is the art and science of making sure that our cities and buildings fit with the way we want to live our lives.
I don't have to come up with the best idea. It is my job to make sure that it is always the best idea that wins.
I believe that architecture, as anything else in life, is evolutionary. Ideas evolve; they don't come from outer space and crash into the drawing board.
Without sin, the universe is a Solemn Game: and there is no good game without rules.
Perhaps all our troubles - all the violence, obesity, illness, depression, and greed we can't overcome - began when we stopped living as Running People. Deny your nature, and it will erupt in some other, uglier way.
There is no escape - we pay for the violence of our ancestors.
We have found that where science has progressed the farthest, the mind has but regained from nature that which the mind put into nature.
Sin is too stupid to see beyond itself.
People define gay cinema solely by content: if there are gay characters in it, it’s a gay film... Heterosexuality to me is a structure as much as it is a content. It is an imposed structure that goes along with the patriarchal, dominant structure that constrains and defines society. If homosexuality is the opposite or the counter-sexual activity to that, then what kind of a structure would it be?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.