The fact of the matter is that the 'real world' is to a large extent unconsciously built up on the language habits of the group.
Edward SapirRead
The psychology of a language which, in one way or another, is imposed upon one because of factors beyond one's control, is very different from the psychology of a language which one accepts of one's free will.
Interpretation
The way we perceive a language differs based on whether it is imposed on us or chosen freely.
This quote by Edward Sapir highlights the significant psychological differences between languages that are forced upon individuals by external circumstances and those that are embraced willingly. When a language is imposed, it may evoke feelings of resistance or alienation, whereas a language chosen freely fosters a deeper connection and engagement, enriching the speaker's identity and experience.
In practice
In a discussion about bilingual education, this quote can illustrate the importance of allowing students to choose their language.
The fact of the matter is that the 'real world' is to a large extent unconsciously built up on the language habits of the group.
National languages are all huge systems of vested interests which sullenly resist critical inquiry.
In a sense, every form of expression is imposed upon one by social factors, one's own language above all.
No important national language, at least in the Occidental world, has complete regularity of grammatical structure, nor is there a single logical category which is adequately and consistently handled in terms of linguistic symbolism.
No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality.
It would, of course, be hopeless to attempt to crowd into an international language all those local overtones of meaning which are so dear to the heart of the nationalist.
Lesbian existence comprises both the breaking of a taboo and the rejection of a compulsory way of life. It is also a direct or indirect attack on the male right of access to women.
Attempts to defend amusement parks and circuses on the grounds that they 'educate' people about animals should not be taken seriously. Such enterprises are part of the commercial entertainment industry. The most important lesson they teach impressionable young minds is that it is acceptable to keep animals in captivity for human amusement.
'Cool' is detached and emotionally cool. My instinct is to battle anything that seems overly cool.
How could people like these, without words to put to their emotions and passions, manage? They could, at best, only suffer dumbly. Their pains and humiliations would work themselves out in their characters alone: like evil spirits possessing a body, so that the body itself might appear innocent of what it did.
Any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still know where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with.
Does the open wound in another's breast soften the pain of the gaping wound in our own? Or does the blood which is welling from another man's side staunch that which is pouring from our own? Does the general anguish of our fellow creatures lessen our own private and particular anguish? No, no, each suffers on his own account, each struggles with his own grief, each sheds his own tears.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.