When I sit down to write, I don't think about writing about an idea or a given message. I just try to write a story which is hard enough.
Jhumpa LahiriRead
If certain books are to be termed 'immigrant fiction,' what do we call the rest? Native fiction? Puritan fiction? This distinction doesn't agree with me.
Interpretation
The quote questions the categorization of literature based on identity and suggests that such labels may be insufficient or flawed.
Jhumpa Lahiri's quote critiques the simplistic categorization of literature into 'immigrant fiction' versus 'native fiction.' By challenging the binary labels, she highlights the complexities of identity and narrative, suggesting that all literature has multiple influences and that restricting them to such terms may overlook the richness of human experience.
In practice
This quote could be mentioned in a discussion about literature in a multicultural classroom.
When I sit down to write, I don't think about writing about an idea or a given message. I just try to write a story which is hard enough.
When I am experiencing a complex story or novel, the broader planes, and also details, tend to fall away.
I think each time you start a story or novel or whatever, you are absolutely at the bottom of the ladder all over again. It doesn't matter what you've done before.
The sky was different, without color, taut and unforgiving. But the water was the most unforgiving thing, nearly black at times, cold enough, I knew, to kill me, violent enough to break me apart. The waves were immense, battering rocky beaches without sand. The farther I went, the more desolate it became, more than any place I'd been, but for this very reason the landscape drew me, claimed me as nothing had in a long time.
On the technical side, I hope that my writing is evolving and maturing, ripening, deepening.
I always wanted to grow up in a house full of books, English books, and I wanted the sort of fireplaces that worked, overstuffed chairs, that whole kind of fantasy of a bookish New England life. So the library gave me that; for the hours that I was there, I was surrounded by that atmosphere that I craved in my life.
And okay, fair enough, but there is this unwritten contract between author and reader and I think not ending your book kind of violates that contract.
My last vivid boyhood fright from books came when I was 15; I was visiting my uncle and aunt in Greenwich, and, emboldened by my success with 'The Waste Land,' I opened their copy of 'Ulysses.' The whiff of death off those remorseless, closely written pages overpowered me. So: back to soluble mysteries, and jokes that were not cosmic.
In literature the ambition of the novice is to acquire the literary language; the struggle of the adept is to get rid of it.
The novels that attract me most are those that create an illusion of transparency around a knot of human relationships as obscure, cruel, and perverse as possible.
I don't know the literary world; I was scared of being confronted with famous names, not knowing what they had written. It was occupied territory I was entering.
I belong to Russian literature, but I am an American citizen, and I think it's the best possible combination.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.