I just don't think that the differences you make by donating to a museum or an art gallery really compare to the differences you make by donating to the charities that fight global poverty.
Interpretation
The quote argues that donating to combat global poverty has a greater impact than contributing to the arts.
Peter Singer emphasizes the moral responsibility individuals have in choosing where to donate their resources. He suggests that while supporting museums and art galleries is valuable, the urgent needs of global poverty should take precedence, as it leads to more significant and immediate changes in people's lives. Singer's perspective challenges us to consider the ethical implications of our charitable choices and encourages a focus on alleviating suffering over supporting cultural institutions.
In practice
During a fundraising event, one might use this quote to emphasize the importance of prioritizing donations to alleviate poverty.
The belief that the animals exist because God created them - and that he created them so we can better meet our needs - is contrary to our scientific understanding of evolution and, of course, to the fossil record, which shows the existence of non-human primates and other animals millions of years before there were any human beings at all.
Pain and suffering are in themselves bad and should be prevented or minimized, irrespective of the race, sex, or species of the being that suffers. How bad a pain is depends on how intense it is and how long it lasts, but pain of the same intensity and duration are equally bad, whether felt by humans or animals.
What is faith? If you believe something because you have evidence for it, or rational argument, that is not faith. So faith seems to be believing something despite the absence of evidence or rational argument for it.
Almost everybody accepts that some people can be killed. 'The concept of 'brain death' - the belief that people on respirators can legitimately be killed - shows that.
If we all think only of our own interests, we are headed for collective disaster - just look at what we are doing to our planet's climate.
Even in the era of AIDS, sex raises no unique moral issues at all. Decisions about sex may involve considerations about honesty, concern for others, prudence, and so on, but there is nothing special about sex in this respect, for the same could be said of decisions about driving a car. (In fact, the moral issues raised by driving a car, both from an environmental and from a safety point of view, are much more serious than those raised by sex.)
Our scientific age demands that we provide definitions, measurements, and statistics in order to be taken seriously. Yet most of the important things in life cannot be precisely defined or measured. Can we define or measure love, beauty, friendship, or decency, for example?
In Italy, where I live now, I have put some distance between myself and the world that has formed me.
Paradise is at your own center; unless you find it there, there is no way to enter.
There is thy gold, worse poison to men's souls, Doing more murder in this loathsome world, Than these poor compounds that thou mayst not sell.
She is very clever, too clever for a woman. She lacks the indefinable charm of weakness.
Only a look and a voice; then darkness again and silence.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.