There is frequently more to be learned from the unexpected questions of a child than the discourses of men.
For where is the man that has incontestable evidence of the truth of all that he holds, or of the falsehood of all he condemns; or can say that he has examined to the bottom all his own, or other men's opinions? The necessity of believing without knowledge, nay often upon very slight grounds, in this fleeting state of action and blindness we are in, should make us more busy and careful to inform ourselves than constrain others.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the importance of self-examination and understanding over dogmatically asserting beliefs.
John Locke reflects on the human condition of uncertainty regarding truth and knowledge. He suggests that no one possesses absolute certainty about their beliefs or the beliefs of others. As such, rather than trying to impose our views on others, we should prioritize our own learning and understanding, recognizing that our perceptions are often based on incomplete information and biases. This call for humility in the face of our limited knowledge urges us to be more diligent and thoughtful in our pursuit of truth.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a philosophy class discussion about the nature of belief.
More from John Locke
All quotes βReading furnishes the mind only with materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.
Our deeds disguise us. People need endless time to try on their deeds, until each knows the proper deeds for him to do. But every day, every hour, rushes by. There is no time.
New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common.
I have always thought the actions of men the best interpreters of their thoughts.
One unerring mark of the love of truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant.
Similar quotes
Wars are just to those to whom they are necessary.
My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs).
As far as I'm concerned, being any gender is a drag.
The fact that astronomies change while the stars abide is a true analogy of every realm of human life and thought, religion not least of all. No existent theology can be a final formulation of spiritual truth.
Be it or be it not true that Man is shapen in iniquity and conceived in sin, it is unquestionably true that Government is begotten of aggression, and by aggression.
God cannot reveal anything to us if we have not His spirit.