But what Freud showed us… was that nothing can be grasped, destroyed, or burnt, except in a symbolic way, as one says, in effigie, in absentia.
Psychoanalysis is a terribly efficient instrument, and because it is more and more a prestigious instrument, we run the risk of using it with a purpose for which it was not made for, and in this way we may degrade it.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote warns against the misuse of psychoanalysis, suggesting that its prestige may lead to inappropriate applications.
Jacques Lacan highlights the dangers of treating psychoanalysis as a tool that can be applied for superficial or unintended purposes. The quote reflects a concern that as psychoanalysis gains recognition and prestige, there is a risk that practitioners may utilize it in ways that compromise its true purpose, thereby undermining its efficacy and integrity. Lacan emphasizes the need to respect the origins and intended functions of such a powerful instrument of psychological exploration.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a therapy session when discussing the ethical use of psychoanalysis.
More from Jacques Lacan
All quotes →The real is what resists symbolization absolutely.
If psychoanalysis clarifies some facts of sexuality, it is not by aiming at them in their own reality, not in biological experience.
I think where I am not, therefore I am where I do not think. I am not whenever I am the plaything of my thought; I think of what I am where I do not think to think.
The reason we go to poetry is not for wisdom, but for the dismantling of wisdom
Meaning is produced not only by the relationship between the signifier and the signified but also, crucially, by the position of the signifiers in relation to other signifiers.
Similar quotes
We live in a world where most people still subscribe to the belief that shame is a good tool for keeping people in line. Not only is this wrong, but it’s dangerous. Shame is highly correlated with addiction, violence, aggression, depression, eating disorders, and bullying.
Many people suffer all their lives from this oppressive feeling of guilt, the sense of not having lived up to their parents' expectations. This feeling is stronger than any intellectual insight they might have, that it is not a child's task or duty to satisfy his parents needs. No argument can overcome these guilt feelings, for they have their beginnings in life's earliest periods, and from that they derive their intensity and obduracy.
We teach people that they upset themselves. We can't change the past, so we change how people are thinking, feeling and behaving today.
Rather than giving people an inflated view of themselves, we need to give them concrete reasons to feel good about themselves.
The ego refuses to be distressed by the provocations of reality, to let itself be compelled to suffer. It insists that it cannot be affected by the traumas of the external world; it shows, in fact, that such traumas are no more than occasions for it to gain pleasure.
One might compare the relation of the ego to the id with that between a rider and his horse. The horse provides the locomotor energy, and the rider has the prerogative of determining the goal and of guiding the movements of his powerful mount towards it. But all too often in the relations between the ego and the id we find a picture of the less ideal situation in which the rider is obliged to guide his horse in the direction in which it itself wants to go.